AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 680M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 680M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 85% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • 9777.8x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 72
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26608 vs 7386
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Texture fill rate 105.6 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 72
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 26608 vs 7386

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 680M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
26608
7386
Name AMD Radeon 680M NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 378
Geekbench - OpenCL 26608 7386
PassMark - G3D Mark 376
PassMark - G2D Mark 29
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2120
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2120

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 680M NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Rembrandt GT215
Launch date 4 Jan 2022 7 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1232 1560
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2200 MHz
Compute units 12
Core clock speed 2000 MHz 1080 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.379 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 72
Pixel fill rate 70.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 105.6 GTexel/s 10.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt
Transistor count 13100 million 727 million
CUDA cores 72
Floating-point performance 155.52 gflops
Gigaflops 233

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.2 10.1
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management 8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
SLI