AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 680M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 9777.8x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 72
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26608 vs 7386
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 72 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 vs 7386 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 680M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 680M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 378 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 | 7386 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 376 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 29 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2120 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2120 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 680M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Rembrandt | GT215 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1560 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 72 |
Pixel fill rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 727 million |
CUDA cores | 72 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 233 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |