AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 760M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 760M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 67.20 GTexel/s vs 23.49 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 13 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s vs 23.49 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
Name | AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5743 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Phoenix | GP108 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 13 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 157 | 155 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 23.49 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 1800 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 31.32 GFLOPS (1:24) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 751.6 GFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 40.10 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |