AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 760M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 760M
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1740 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 90 Watt
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1740 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 904
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 5648
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 20395
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 4 Jan 2023 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 904 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 5648 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 20395 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | 942 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5648 | 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20395 | 49885 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Phoenix | GA107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 165 | 88 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1740 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 55.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 125.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 90 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 224.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |