AMD Radeon E6460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6460 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 4.8 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 188
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 vs 8.55
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1925 vs 1626
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1925 vs 1626
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 vs 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1925 vs 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1925 vs 1626 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 424 vs 324
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.121 vs 1.616
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 vs 104.843
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.005 vs 4.942
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 660 vs 531
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 801
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 660 vs 531
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 801
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 1048 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 vs 324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 vs 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 vs 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 vs 4.942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 vs 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 vs 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 vs 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 vs 801 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 324 | 424 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 | 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.843 | 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.942 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 | 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 531 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 801 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1925 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 531 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 801 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1925 | 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Caicos | GF108 |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1517 | 1518 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |