NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E6460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon E6460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 6x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 192 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 3200 MHz
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.049 vs 1.616
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 342.738 vs 104.843
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.945 vs 0.225
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.549 vs 4.942
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.128 vs 18.457
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2550 vs 531
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1938 vs 801
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3926 vs 1925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460

• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 12.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 531 vs 43.2
• 25.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 801 vs 31.3
• 27.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1925 vs 70.1

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6460

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.049 1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	342.738 104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.945 0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.549 4.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.128 18.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2550 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1938 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3926 1925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.2 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.3 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.1 1925

Compare specifications (specs)