AMD Radeon E6460 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6460 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1598 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 38
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1598 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 324
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1925
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1925
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 vs 324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 vs 1925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 vs 1925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6460
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 324 | 367 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.942 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 801 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1925 | 2376 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 801 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1925 | 2376 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Caicos | G94 |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1517 | 1520 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1598 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |