AMD Radeon E6460 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6460 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6460

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 530 MHz
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
  • Around 51% better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1598 MHz
  • 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 38
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 April 2011 vs 14 August 2008
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 530 MHz
Pipelines 160 vs 48
Floating-point performance 192 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 1598 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 vs 38

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

  • 2.7x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 324
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2376 vs 1925
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2376 vs 1925
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 12.72 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 367 vs 324
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2376 vs 1925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2376 vs 1925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6460
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
324
367
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
225
38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1925
2376
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1925
2376
Name AMD Radeon E6460 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark 324 367
PassMark - G2D Mark 225 38
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 104.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 4.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.457
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1925 2376
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 801
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1925 2376

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E6460 NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla
Code name Caicos G94
Launch date 7 April 2011 14 August 2008
Place in performance rating 1517 1520
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $99.95
Price now $99.95
Value for money (0-100) 7.66

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 530 MHz
Floating-point performance 192 gflops 127.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 160 48
Texture fill rate 4.8 GTexel / s 12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-HE
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 51.1 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 1598 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD