AMD Radeon E6460 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E6460 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E6460
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 71% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 4.8 GTexel / s versus 2.8 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 160 versus 48
- Environ 43% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 192 gflops versus 134.4 gflops
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3200 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 188
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.457 versus 8.55
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1925 versus 1626
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1925 versus 1626
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 April 2011 versus 3 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.8 GTexel / s versus 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 192 gflops versus 134.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 versus 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1925 versus 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1925 versus 1626 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 600 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1048 MB versus 512 MB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 424 versus 324
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.121 versus 1.616
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 versus 104.843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.005 versus 4.942
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 660 versus 531
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 versus 801
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 660 versus 531
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 versus 801
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1048 MB versus 512 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 424 versus 324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 versus 1.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 versus 104.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 versus 4.942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 versus 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 versus 801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 versus 531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 versus 801 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 324 | 424 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.616 | 3.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.843 | 109.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.942 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.457 | 8.55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 531 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 801 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1925 | 1626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 531 | 660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 801 | 1158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1925 | 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1163 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon E6460 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Caicos | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 7 April 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1517 | 1518 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 192 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.8 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 370 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1048 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |