AMD Radeon E8860 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8860 and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 37 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 61% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1643
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 339
- 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 4199
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.395 vs 14.45
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 529.248 vs 403.983
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.683 vs 0.992
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.803 vs 15.202
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.86 vs 24.266
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3353
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 January 2014 vs 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 753.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 vs 1643 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 vs 4199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 vs 14.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 vs 403.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 vs 0.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.803 vs 15.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.86 vs 24.266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 654 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 31.39 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2527 vs 1246
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 1655
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2527 vs 1246
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 1655
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2527 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 vs 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2527 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 vs 1655 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8860
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8860 | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 | 1643 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 | 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 | 4199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 | 14.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 | 403.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 | 0.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.803 | 15.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.86 | 24.266 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1246 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1655 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1246 | 2527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1655 | 3505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8860 | NVIDIA Quadro K3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Venus | GK104 |
Launch date | 25 January 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1030 | 1033 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $155 | |
Price now | $155 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 654 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | 31.39 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |