Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon E9171 MCM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel UHD Graphics 617

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
646x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt

Launch date	7 November 2018 vs 3 October 2017
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

3.7x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz
21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24

Core clock speed	1124 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 617	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Geekbench - OpenCL	3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1633
PassMark - G2D Mark	231
PassMark - G3D Mark	870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		27.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		924.953
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		52.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		97.705

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 617	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Code name	Amber Lake GT2	Lexa
Launch date	7 November 2018	3 October 2017
Place in performance rating	1225	1226
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1219 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	512
Pixel fill rate	3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s	39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,248 gflops
Transistor count		2,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		96 GB / s
Memory clock speed		6000 MHz