AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
Name | AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Lexa | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1383 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |