AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro S7150

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD FirePro S7150

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 117.6 GTexel / s
Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
Around 55% better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 3,763 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36624 vs 29623
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 27.544
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.586 vs 570.969
13.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.473 vs 0.687
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 96.618 vs 23.637
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6622 vs 6147
5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3208 vs 583
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6622 vs 6147
5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3208 vs 583

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 September 2016 vs 1 February 2016
Core clock speed	1120 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s vs 117.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1792
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops vs 3,763 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624 vs 29623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64 vs 27.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586 vs 570.969
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473 vs 0.687
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618 vs 23.637
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622 vs 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3208 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622 vs 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3208 vs 583

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150

Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3597
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3597

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4359 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4359 vs 3597

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36624

29623

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

112.64

27.544

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.586

570.969

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9.473

0.687

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

96.618

23.637

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

6147

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

4359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

583

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

6147

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

4359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

583

Name	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	AMD FirePro S7150
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624	29623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64	27.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586	570.969
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473	0.687
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618	23.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622	6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3597	4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3208	583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622	6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3597	4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3208	583
PassMark - G3D Mark		2727
PassMark - G2D Mark		465

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	AMD FirePro S7150
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Ellesmere	Tonga
Launch date	27 September 2016	1 February 2016
Place in performance rating	501	634
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,399
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz
Core clock speed	1120 MHz	1050 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops	3,763 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2304	1792
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s	117.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	5,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		241 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5