AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 13.2x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
  • 96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Launch date 27 September 2016 vs 1 March 2007
Core clock speed 1120 MHz vs 575 MHz
Boost clock speed 1266 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 24
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1200 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Name AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Geekbench - OpenCL 36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3208
PassMark - G3D Mark 306
PassMark - G2D Mark 309

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Curie
Code name Ellesmere G71
Launch date 27 September 2016 1 March 2007
Place in performance rating 515 514
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $99.99
Price now $99.99
Value for money (0-100) 3.97

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1266 MHz 575 MHz
Core clock speed 1120 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 90 nm
Pipelines 2304 24
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s 13.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 278 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-III
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 9.0c
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 38.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 700 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 256
Shared memory 0