AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 12.7x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- 10.6x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3597 vs 1436
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3208 vs 1711
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3597 vs 1436
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3208 vs 1711
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 1 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 vs 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 vs 1711 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | 1711 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 743 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | GK208 |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 1 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 495 | 541 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
