AMD Radeon HD 6230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6230 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 233
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2011 vs 14 May 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 233 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 11.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 669 vs 179
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1064 vs 252
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1064 vs 252
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1589 vs 744
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1589 vs 744
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1293
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1293
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 669 vs 179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1293 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 179 | 669 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 252 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 252 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 744 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 744 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1293 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1293 | 2716 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.27 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6230 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Park | GF108 |
Launch date | 2 July 2011 | 14 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1373 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |