AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and AMD Radeon HD 6230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 265 vs 179
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 930 vs 744
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1631 vs 1293
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 930 vs 744
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1631 vs 1293
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 2 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 80 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 vs 179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 vs 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 vs 1293 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6230
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 102.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | AMD Radeon HD 6230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 265 | 179 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 78 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 | 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 252 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | AMD Radeon HD 6230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kalindi | Park |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 2 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1369 | 1372 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz |