AMD Radeon HD 6450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6450 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 160 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 44
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.878 vs 0.465
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 810 vs 127
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 810 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 vs 21 February 2008 |
Pipelines | 160 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 96 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.878 vs 0.465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 810 vs 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 810 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 198
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1627
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1627
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 1627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 | 477 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.878 | 0.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 810 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 3161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 810 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 3161 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Caicos | G94 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 21 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 1627 | 1587 |
Price now | $39.99 | $39.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.02 | 23.72 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 64 |
Stream Processors | 160 | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 96 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 505 million |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x8 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |