AMD Radeon HD 8250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8250 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1075 vs 633
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 212 vs 198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 7 April 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1075 vs 633 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 vs 198 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 750 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 160 vs 128
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 59
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 810 vs 628
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 810 vs 628
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 1343
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 1343
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 497 vs 384
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 497 vs 384
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 128 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 59 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 810 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 810 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 vs 1343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 1343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 497 vs 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 497 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1075 | 633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 119 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 | 198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 | 810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 | 810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 | 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 | 1627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 384 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 384 | 497 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8250 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Temash | Caicos |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 7 April 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1625 | 1627 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 160 | |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 370 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 8250 with others
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G100 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
AMDRadeon HD 8250 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 600
