AMD Radeon HD 6450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6450 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 28.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 198 vs 67
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 56
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 892
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 892
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 April 2011 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 28.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 vs 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 vs 892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 892 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 | 67 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 56 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 639 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.878 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 497 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 810 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 497 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 810 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 892 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Caicos | G86 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 9 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1627 | 1624 |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 28.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 16 |
| Stream Processors | 160 | |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 210 million |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 / GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
| PCI-E 16x | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6450 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8400M GT
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G100 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 405 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 315 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7290 IGP
