Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 319 vs 198
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1004 vs 632
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 1.878
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 vs 0.231
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.876 vs 4.982
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 810
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1627
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 810
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1627

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450

• 13.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 12
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 92
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 97.327 vs 56.77
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.314 vs 6.882
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 497 vs 476
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 497 vs 476

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 198
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 1.878
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 97.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 0.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 4.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 19.314
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1627

Compare specifications (specs)