AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 7.09 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
• 20x more pipelines: 320 vs 16
• 6.3x better floating-point performance: 283.52 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 337 vs 143
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 vs 41
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1614 vs 1052
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1614 vs 1052

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 443 MHz
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2724 vs 876

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	337 143
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	136 41
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	876 2724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1614 1052
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1614 1052

Compare specifications (specs)