AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750 and ATI Radeon HD 4890 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 190 Watt
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 280 vs 66

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 800 vs 720
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 3900 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1539 vs 1045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4890

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 1539
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	280 66
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348

Compare specifications (specs)