AMD Radeon E8860 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8860 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 37 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1045
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 280
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.395 vs 8.039
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.683 vs 0.867
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3358
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 720 vs 640
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 529.248
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 vs 15.803
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 47.86
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2100 vs 1246
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 1655
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2100 vs 1246
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 1655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8860
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1686 1045
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	436 280
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.395 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	529.248 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.683 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.803 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47.86 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1246 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1655 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4345 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1246 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1655 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4345 3358

Compare specifications (specs)