NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 3.2x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• Around 87% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 720
• 2x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3278 vs 1045
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 351 vs 280
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 8.039
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 vs 544.041
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 vs 0.867
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 vs 20.664
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 vs 91.074

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 758 MHz
• Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2100 vs 1263
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3111
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2100 vs 1263
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 2409
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3111

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3278 1045
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	351 280
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.081 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	879.575 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.823 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.155 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	99.75 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3111 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3111 3358

Compare specifications (specs)