NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1554 vs 1043
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 273
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 8.039
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 vs 0.867
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 2100
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 2100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 vs 21 January 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 vs 1043 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 vs 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 vs 0.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 2100 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 3.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 192
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 116 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 354.392
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 vs 18.511
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 vs 41.941
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 vs 3351
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3322
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 vs 3351
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 116 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 vs 354.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 vs 18.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 vs 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3322 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 | 1043 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | 8.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | 544.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | 0.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | 20.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | 91.074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | 2100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | 3378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF116 | Juniper |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $49.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1046 | 1047 |
| Price now | $287.59 | $49.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | 33.46 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 720 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | 170 mm |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
