AMD Radeon HD 6750 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6750 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.3x more boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 5.3x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
• 20x more pipelines: 720 vs 36
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 960 MHz
• 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 135
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1398
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1398

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 280

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 135
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	280 287
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1398

Compare specifications (specs)