AMD Radeon HD 6750M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6750M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 336
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 150 Watt
Date de sortie | 4 January 2011 versus 11 October 2010 |
Pipelines | 480 versus 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 36.4 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 52% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 873.6 gflops versus 576.0 gflops
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3400 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 versus 4.363
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 versus 214.155
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 versus 0.331
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 versus 13.844
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 versus 30.439
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3331
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3331
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.4 GTexel / s versus 14.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 873.6 gflops versus 576.0 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3400 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 versus 4.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 versus 214.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 versus 0.331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 versus 13.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 versus 30.439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 937 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.363 | 22.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.155 | 661.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.331 | 1.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.844 | 28.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.439 | 76.736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3353 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6750M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Whistler | GF104 |
Date de sortie | 4 January 2011 | 11 October 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1087 | 1088 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops | 873.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.4 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 210 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |