NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 81% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 254 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 2534
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 373
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 3977
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 19 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- 3x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 960
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
- 700x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Barts |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 19 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 740 | 741 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 2x 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |