AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 480
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)
Launch date | 19 September 2011 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 254 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13143 vs 3977
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 0.789
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 373
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 2534
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13143 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 0.789 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 373 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 2534 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3977 | 13143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.789 | 4.245 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | 430 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2534 | 4121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Barts | GF100 |
Launch date | 19 September 2011 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 741 | 742 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 960 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 254 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 3,100 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 134.4 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |