NVIDIA GRID K520 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 8.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 2x 960
- Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2x 1,536.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 254 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2x 2 GB
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4200 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 2534
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 3977
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 19 September 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 2x 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2x 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 2534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 160
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 vs 160 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K520 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Barts |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 19 September 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Place in performance rating | 738 | 741 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 2x 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |