NVIDIA GRID K520 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 8.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 2x 960
  • Around 59% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2x 1,536.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 254 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2x 2 GB
  • Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4200 MHz
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 2534
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 3977
  • 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 19 September 2011
Texture fill rate 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Pipelines 2x 1536 vs 2x 960
Floating-point performance 2x 2,448 gflops vs 2x 1,536.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 254 Watt
Maximum memory size 2x 4 GB vs 2x 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3516 vs 2534
Geekbench - OpenCL 10864 vs 3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.244 vs 0.789

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 160
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 373 vs 160

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3516
2534
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
160
373
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10864
3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.244
0.789
Name NVIDIA GRID K520 AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark 3516 2534
PassMark - G2D Mark 160 373
Geekbench - OpenCL 10864 3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.97
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1063.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.244 0.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 42.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 76.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K520 AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK104 Barts
Launch date 23 July 2013 19 September 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $3,599
Place in performance rating 738 741
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 2,448 gflops 2x 1,536.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 2x 1536 2x 960
Texture fill rate 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 254 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 1,700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 4 GB 2x 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 2x 160.0 GB / s 2x 134.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 256 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 4200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5