AMD Radeon HD 6970 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 84.5 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 2,703.4 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 vs 15182
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 920.398 vs 872.651
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.219 vs 32.378
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 273.175 vs 132.363
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 December 2010 vs 9 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 84.5 GTexel / s vs 49.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,703.4 gflops vs 1,581.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 vs 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 vs 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 vs 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 vs 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 244 Watt vs 550 Watt
- Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1375 MHz
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 vs 2839
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 432
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 vs 18.676
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 vs 1.835
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 vs 5372
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 vs 5372
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt vs 550 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1375 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 vs 2839 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 vs 18.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 vs 1.835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 vs 5372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 vs 5372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6970
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2839 | 4630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 | 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.676 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.835 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Cayman | GF110 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 14 December 2010 | 9 November 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $369 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 662 | 620 |
Price now | $94.99 | $289.88 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.01 | 19.21 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 880 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,703.4 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 84.5 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 550 Watt | 244 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,640 million | 3,000 million |
Core clock speed | 1544 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 512 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |