AMD Radeon HD 6970 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 71% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 84.5 GTexel / s versus 49.4 billion / sec
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,581.1 gflops
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 versus 15182
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 920.398 versus 872.651
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.219 versus 32.378
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 273.175 versus 132.363
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 December 2010 versus 9 November 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84.5 GTexel / s versus 49.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,581.1 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 versus 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 versus 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 versus 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 versus 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 244 Watt versus 550 Watt
- Environ 46% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4630 versus 2839
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 versus 432
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.048 versus 18.676
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.338 versus 1.835
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5953 versus 5372
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5953 versus 5372
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt versus 550 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) versus 1375 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4630 versus 2839 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 versus 432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 versus 18.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 versus 1.835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 versus 5372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 versus 5372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6970
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2839 | 4630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 | 15182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.676 | 40.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 | 872.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.835 | 4.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 | 32.378 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 | 132.363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 | 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 809 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Cayman | GF110 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 14 December 2010 | 9 November 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $369 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 662 | 620 |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | $289.88 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 48.01 | 19.21 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 880 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,703.4 gflops | 1,581.1 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84.5 GTexel / s | 49.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 550 Watt | 244 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,640 million | 3,000 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1544 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin and One 8-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |