Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and AMD Radeon HD 6970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 880 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 18.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 550 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 14 December 2010 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 880 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 550 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6970
- 8.1x more texture fill rate: 84.5 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 38.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 40
- 26x better floating-point performance: 2,703.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2839 vs 1180
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 390
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5372 vs 2095
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5372 vs 2095
- 7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35739 vs 5083
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3285
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 84.5 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,703.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2839 vs 1180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 vs 390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 vs 2095 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 vs 5083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1180 | 2839 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | 5372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | 5372 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5083 | 35739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 | 3716 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | Cayman |
| Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 14 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 661 | 662 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $369 | |
| Price now | $94.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 880 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2,703.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 40 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.4 GTexel / s | 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | eDRAM | DDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDFirePro D300
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200 vs
IntelArc Pro A40
