AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 160 vs 32
- 2x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 289 vs 166
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 51
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2012 vs 10 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 738 MHz |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops vs 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 289 vs 166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 51 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 11.81 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 1044
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1731 vs 1702
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 1044
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1731 vs 1702
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 11.81 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1731 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1731 vs 1702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 289 | 166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 51 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 790 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 540 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 540 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 | 1731 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Caicos | G96C |
| Launch date | 5 January 2012 | 10 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1491 | 606 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 16.13 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM with others
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220M
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 380M
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 6380G IGP
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
AMDFirePro M2000
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
