AMD Radeon HD 7480D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7480D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7480D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1704 vs 1624
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1704 vs 1624
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 11 October 2010 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 vs 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 vs 1624 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 614 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2227 vs 683
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 348
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 348
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 vs 120
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 602 vs 279
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1235
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1235
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 614 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2227 vs 683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 348 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 vs 120 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 602 vs 279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 1235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 1235 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7480D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 683 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 348 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 348 | 1080 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 202 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 279 | 602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1235 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1235 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 1624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7480D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Trinity | GF108 |
Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 11 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1499 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $35.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 724 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 614 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 96 |
CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |