AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 389.1 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 389.1 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 479 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 141 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 999 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 999 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Devastator | GF117 |
Launch date | 2 October 2012 | 1 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $101 | |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1213 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 389.1 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 12.16 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |