AMD Radeon HD 7560D vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7560D and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1076 vs 1044
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1076 vs 1044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 7 February 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1076 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1076 vs 1044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 480 vs 256
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1561 vs 1423
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 593
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 593
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1990
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1990
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 165
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 459
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1561 vs 1423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1990 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 165 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 459 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1423 | 1561 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 593 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 593 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1076 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1076 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1990 | 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1990 | 2716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 218 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | 559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7560D | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Trinity | Thames |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1426 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||

