AMD Radeon HD 7560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7560D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 256 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 vs 112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 vs 27 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 144 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 vs 112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2915 vs 1423
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 593
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 593
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1076
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1076
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1990
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1990
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 653 vs 459
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2915 vs 1423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 1990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 1990 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 vs 459 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1423 | 2915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 593 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 593 | 1134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1076 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1076 | 2265 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1990 | 2827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1990 | 2827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 | 112 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | 653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Trinity | GF106 |
| Launch date | 26 September 2012 | 27 October 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1423 | 1424 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 144 |
| Boost clock speed | 753 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
| Floating-point performance | 388.8 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
