AMD Radeon HD 7610M vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7610M and AMD Radeon HD 6950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 445
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2632 vs 2523
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2632 vs 2523
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 14 December 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 500 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 vs 2523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 vs 2523 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1408 vs 400
- 6.3x better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2602 vs 632
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6105 vs 5257
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 3339
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 70.4 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,252.8 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2602 vs 632 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 vs 5257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 632 | 2602 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 445 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5257 | 6105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 | 2523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 | 2523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 11657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 11657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.999 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.659 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | Whistler | Cayman |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 14 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 685 | 686 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Price now | $89.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 1408 |
| Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,640 million |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7610M with others
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6950
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDFirePro S9000
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
