AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 11.5x more texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 1792 vs 400
- 9.2x better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2817 vs 632
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13719 vs 5257
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2632
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2632
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2817 vs 632 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13719 vs 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 374
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 374 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2817 | 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13719 | 5257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tahiti | Whistler |
Launch date | 8 January 2013 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 682 | 685 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |