AMD Radeon HD 7610M vs AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7610M and AMD Radeon HD 6990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 18.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 375 Watt
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6990
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 830 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 31.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 9 GTexel / s
- 7.7x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 400
- 14.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3014 vs 632
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 479
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2632
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2632
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 830 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,549.8 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3014 vs 632 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 632 | 3014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5257 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2632 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2632 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.264 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.76 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7610M | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | Whistler | Antilles |
| Launch date | 7 January 2012 | 8 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 671 | 672 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 830 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 2x 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 295 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7610M with others
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3470
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
AMDRadeon HD 7610M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
