AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 15 February 2012 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 21.658
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 566.052
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 2.182
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 37.143
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 98.126
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 98.126 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 425 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 33.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 1127.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 3.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 57.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 119.136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GF110 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch date | 15 February 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1143 |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 248 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 177.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 7750 with others
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTX
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
AMDRadeon HD 7750 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
