AMD Radeon HD 8180 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8180 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8180
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3055 vs 1274
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 13 April 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3055 vs 1274 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 7.2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 225 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 312 vs 139
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 vs 35
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 903 vs 875
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 903 vs 875
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 vs 1239
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 vs 1239
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 225 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 vs 139 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 903 vs 875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 903 vs 875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1455 vs 1239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1455 vs 1239 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8180
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8180 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 139 | 312 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 135 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3055 | 1274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 875 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 875 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1239 | 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1239 | 1455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.574 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 545 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Temash | GF119 |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 13 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1595 | 1597 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.58 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 225 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | |
Transistor count | 292 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB (DDR3) | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |