AMD Radeon HD 8250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8250 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 43
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 212 vs 123
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 628 vs 449
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 628 vs 449
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 vs 17 April 2007 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 43 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 vs 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 vs 449 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1397 vs 1343
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1397 vs 1343
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1397 vs 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1397 vs 1343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1075 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 43 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 | 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 628 | 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 628 | 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1343 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1343 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8250 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | Tesla |
Code name | Temash | G84 |
Launch date | 1 June 2013 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1619 | 1624 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 540 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 76.16 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 8.6 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | |
Transistor count | 289 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
SLI |