AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 910M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

  • 490322.6x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 120
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 3020
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 3020
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 6080 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 150 vs 120
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 vs 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 vs 3020

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 760 MHz
  • 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 315
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 737
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 359
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 359
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1386
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1386
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs July 2013
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 760 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 128
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 590 vs 315
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 vs 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1344 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1344 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 vs 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 vs 1386

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 910M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
150
120
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
315
590
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
737
2629
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
2590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
3020
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
3020
Name AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP NVIDIA GeForce 910M
PassMark - G2D Mark 150 120
PassMark - G3D Mark 315 590
Geekbench - OpenCL 737 2629
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 359 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 359 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1386 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1386 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 3020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.733

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 Fermi 2.0
Code name Scrapper Lite GF117
Launch date July 2013 18 August 2015
Place in performance rating 1379 1381
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Compute units 2
Core clock speed 760 MHz 775 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 28 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 194.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 128 384
Pixel fill rate 3040 GPixel/s
Render output units 4
Texture fill rate 6080 GTexel/s 12.4 GTexel / s
Texture Units 8
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 585 million
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 11.2 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus