AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 910M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 490322.6x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 vs 113
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 3020
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 3020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 vs 113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 3020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 3020 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 760 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 588 vs 316
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 737
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 vs 359
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 vs 359
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1386
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1386
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 760 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 588 vs 316 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 vs 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 vs 359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 vs 359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 vs 1386 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 vs 1386 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 910M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 113 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 316 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 737 | 2629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 3020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 3020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Scrapper Lite | GF117 |
| Launch date | July 2013 | 18 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1379 | 1382 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 2 | |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 8 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 585 million |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||

