AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1386 vs 878
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 878
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2227
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 vs 2227 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 148
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 312
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4580 vs 783
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 359
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 148 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 vs 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 vs 783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 vs 359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 | 244 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 312 | 1045 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 783 | 4580 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 | 2227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Scrapper Lite | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | July 2013 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1382 | 1383 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 8 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |