AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1386 vs 878
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1386 vs 878
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3112 vs 2227
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3112 vs 2227
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1386 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1386 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 vs 2227

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 148
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 312
  • 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4580 vs 783
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 359
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 359
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs July 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 vs 148
PassMark - G3D Mark 1045 vs 312
Geekbench - OpenCL 4580 vs 783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 vs 359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
148
244
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
312
1045
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
783
4580
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
2227
Name AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G2D Mark 148 244
PassMark - G3D Mark 312 1045
Geekbench - OpenCL 783 4580
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 359 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 359 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1386 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1386 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 2227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.881
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 365

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP Intel UHD Graphics 620

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 Generation 9.5
Code name Scrapper Lite Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date July 2013 1 September 2017
Place in performance rating 1382 1383
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Compute units 2
Core clock speed 760 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 14 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 194.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 128 24
Pixel fill rate 3040 GPixel/s
Render output units 4
Texture fill rate 6080 GTexel/s
Texture Units 8
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 11.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync