AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Intel HD Graphics 520

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and Intel HD Graphics 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
Core clock speed 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 24

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 151
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 864 vs 316
  • 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3993 vs 737
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 951 vs 359
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 951 vs 359
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1386
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1386
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3112
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3112
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs July 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 209 vs 151
PassMark - G3D Mark 864 vs 316
Geekbench - OpenCL 3993 vs 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 951 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 951 vs 359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1462 vs 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1462 vs 1386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337 vs 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337 vs 3112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
151
209
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
316
864
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
737
3993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
951
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
359
951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1386
1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3112
3337
Name AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP Intel HD Graphics 520
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 209
PassMark - G3D Mark 316 864
Geekbench - OpenCL 737 3993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 359 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 359 951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1386 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1386 1462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3112 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3112 3337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 143.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.182
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 326

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP Intel HD Graphics 520

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 Generation 9.0
Code name Scrapper Lite Skylake GT2
Launch date July 2013 1 September 2015
Place in performance rating 1379 1381
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Compute units 2
Core clock speed 760 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 14 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 194.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 128 24
Pixel fill rate 3040 GPixel/s
Render output units 4
Texture fill rate 6080 GTexel/s
Texture Units 8
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 11.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync