AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP vs Intel HD Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP and Intel HD Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4676923.1x more texture fill rate: 6080 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 6
- 44.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 359 vs 8
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 6 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 vs 8 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 10.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 151
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 464 vs 316
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 737
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 470 vs 359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs July 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 151 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 464 vs 316 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 737 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 470 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel HD Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | 193 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 316 | 464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 737 | 5315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 359 | 470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 359 | 8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1386 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1386 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3112 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 8370D IGP | Intel HD Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Scrapper Lite | Broadwell GT1 |
| Launch date | July 2013 | 5 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1379 | 1384 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 2 | |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 194.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 128 | 6 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3040 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Texture fill rate | 6080 GTexel/s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 8 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 1,300 million |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 15.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | |

