AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1203 vs 962

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 November 2013 vs 15 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	1203 vs 962

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G

3.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 128
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 341 vs 271
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 103 vs 77
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 930
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 1631
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 930
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 1631

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	400 vs 128
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	341 vs 271
PassMark - G2D Mark	103 vs 77
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1755 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3310 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1755 vs 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3310 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

271

341

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

103

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1203

962

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1755

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3310

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930

1755

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

3310

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G3D Mark	271	341
PassMark - G2D Mark	77	103
Geekbench - OpenCL	1203	962
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	930	1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1631	3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	930	1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1631	3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		790
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		790

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP	AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Terascale 2
Code name	Kalindi	Llano
Launch date	23 November 2013	15 June 2011
Place in performance rating	1351	1354
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	400 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	102.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	128	400
Texture fill rate	3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt
Transistor count	1,178 million	1000 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11
OpenGL	4.5
Memory
Memory type	System Shared
Shared memory		1