AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 240 MHz
  • 32x more pipelines: 128 vs 4
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
  • 90.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 271 vs 3
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 November 2013 vs 1 September 2002
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 240 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 150 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 271 vs 3

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

  • 300x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 77
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 960 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 111 vs 77

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
271
3
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
77
111
Name AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark 271 3
PassMark - G2D Mark 77 111
Geekbench - OpenCL 1203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 224.569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 930
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1631

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Rage 7
Code name Kalindi M9
Launch date 23 November 2013 1 September 2002
Place in performance rating 1351 1348
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 240 MHz
Floating-point performance 102.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 150 nm
Pipelines 128 4
Texture fill rate 3.2 GTexel / s 960 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt
Transistor count 1,178 million 36 million
Boost clock speed 240 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP AGP 4x

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 8.1
OpenGL 4.5 1.4

Memory

Memory type System Shared 128
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 3.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 200 Bit
Memory clock speed 400 MHz
Shared memory 0