AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 240 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 128 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 90.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 271 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 1 September 2002 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Pipelines | 128 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 271 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
- 300x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 77
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 77 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 271 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Kalindi | M9 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 1 September 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1351 | 1348 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 36 million |
Boost clock speed | 240 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 4x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | 128 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 200 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |