AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 14.911
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 533.677
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 1.681
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 31.229
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 66.187
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 930 vs 475
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1631 vs 657
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 930 vs 475
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1631 vs 657
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 November 2013 vs 28 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197 vs 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192 vs 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.774 vs 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.241 vs 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 224.569 vs 66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 930 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1631 vs 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 930 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1631 vs 657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

  • Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 10.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
  • 2.6x more pipelines: 336 vs 128
  • 7.5x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
  • 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 271
  • 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 77
  • 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 1203
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 336 vs 128
Floating-point performance 772.8 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1877 vs 271
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 vs 77
Geekbench - OpenCL 5696 vs 1203

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
271
1877
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
77
364
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1203
5696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.197
14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1322.192
533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.774
1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
47.241
31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
224.569
66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
930
475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
930
475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
657
Name AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark 271 1877
PassMark - G2D Mark 77 364
Geekbench - OpenCL 1203 5696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.197 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1322.192 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.774 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 47.241 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 224.569 66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 930 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1631 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 930 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1631 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 296

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Kalindi GF114
Launch date 23 November 2013 28 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1351 1353
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 102.4 gflops 772.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 128 336
Texture fill rate 3.2 GTexel / s 32.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,178 million 1,950 million
CUDA cores 336

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI