AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 vs 14.911
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 vs 533.677
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 vs 1.681
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 vs 31.229
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 vs 66.187
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 930 vs 475
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1631 vs 657
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 930 vs 475
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1631 vs 657
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 vs 28 June 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 vs 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 vs 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 vs 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 vs 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 vs 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 vs 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 vs 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 vs 657 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 10.1x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 336 vs 128
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 102.4 gflops
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 271
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 77
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 1203
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops vs 102.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 vs 271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 vs 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 vs 1203 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 271 | 1877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 | 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1203 | 5696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | 14.911 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | 533.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | 1.681 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | 31.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 | 66.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 | 475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 | 657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Kalindi | GF114 |
Launch date | 23 November 2013 | 28 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1351 | 1353 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | 772.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,178 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |